Is San Francisco giving gardeners toxic sludge compost?

March 8, 2010

San Francisco wears its environmental consciousness like a green badge of honor. Residents separate and recycle their food scraps. Streets close to cars so people can walk and bike them. A city department even gives away “high-quality, nutrient-rich, organic bio-solids compost” to any and all takers.

But hold on there: A public interest and environmental advocacy group says San Francisco’s free compost, used by community, backyard and school gardens in the Bay Area, is processed sewage sludge — the product of anything flushed, poured or dumped into the wastewater system, including industrial, chemical and pharmaceutical toxins.

“This sludge belongs in a hazardous waste dump,” said Ronnie Cummins, national director of the Organic Consumers Association, before he poured some of the compost on carefully laid out plastic sheeting at the steps of San Francisco City Hall on Thursday.

The protest, he said, was the launch of an all-out campaign the organic foods movement is planning to wage against the use of bio-solids compost.

The San Francisco Public Utilities Commission, which manages the city’s sewage treatment, says the 1 percent of the city’s 80,000 tons of sewage that is converted into compost each year is treated and tested to the point of sterility.

San Francisco isn’t even the only California city to have bio-solid giveaways, according to the Organic Consumers Association. Los Angeles, San Diego, San Juan Capistrano, Santa Rosa, Fortuna, Carlsbad and Calabasas do the same.

Not only that, sewage or bio-solids compost is packaged and sold in major house and garden centers across the country. And fertilizer made from bio-solids is used on millions of acres of land throughout the U.S. where plants are grown, according to a report by the U.S. Geological Survey. That fertilizer is not treated and heated to the point where it becomes compost and is not used for human food crops, though it is used for animal food crops.

Focal point for the issue
San Francisco’s bio-solids compost has become the focal point for the issue precisely because the city is so environmentally aware, say organic groups.

“San Francisco as the greenest large city in the country should be the first to stop this,” Cummins said.

Federally mandated testing shows that the compost has far lower levels of nine pollutants than the Environmental Protection Agency deems acceptable, San Francisco Public Utilities Commission spokesman Tyrone Jue said.

“We’re in the business of protecting public health and the environment,” Jue said. “That’s our mandate and our mission statement. That’s what we do. If for even a minute we thought one of our activities was going against that mandate, we would absolutely stop doing it.”

But the problem, say groups like the Organic Consumers Association and the Center for Food Safety, is that the EPA requires testing only for nine metals, when there are potentially thousands of chemicals in the compost.

The EPA is evaluating if more pollutants need to be regulated, and believes additional studies are needed, said Lauren Fondal, an environmental engineer for the EPA office in San Francisco.

“I don’t believe there have been any major studies of all these chemical that we’ve begun detecting,” she said.

No hard science
There is no hard science that bio-solids compost is perfectly safe, the organic groups say, while there is anecdotal evidence that it is not.

In 2008, for example, a federal judge in Georgia ruled in favor of farmers who sued the U.S. Department of Agriculture when their cows became ill and died after eating silage grown on land upon which the compost had been applied.

“The EPA cannot assure the public that current land application practices are protective of human health and the environment,” U.S. District Court Judge Anthony Alaimo.

Last fall, The Center for Food Safety, a watchdog group with offices in Washington, D.C., and San Francisco, tried to raise awareness of the “bio-solids” issue when it petitioned San Francisco to end the compost giveaways.

The city made no promises. But the PUC did stop calling its free compost “organic.” Under USDA rules, no sewage sludge compost, or farms that use bio-solids, can be called “organic.”

On Thursday, when the Minnesota-based members of The Organic Consumer Association held their “toxic sludge giveback” at City Hall, five protesters were flanked by about a dozen reporters and curious passers-by.

One of those watching was Jue of the PUC. He said that the city still considers the compost giveaways a pilot project. The city has held six giveaways since 2007. Jue said it has none planned for the near future.

“Of course, if the public doesn’t want it, we’ll stop,” he said.


Copyright 2010  AP News

 


Originally Published: “Is San Francisco giving gardeners toxic sludge compost?” by Evelyn Nieves, AP at Mother Nature Network.

 

Filed under: News

Tags: , , ,

Leave a Comment

(required)

(required), (Hidden)

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

RSS feed for comments on this post.


Categories

Archives

Food Rights Network

Follow us on Twitter!

  1. Food Rights Network
    Food Rights Network: “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”: A Concerned Citizen Uncovers @WholeFoods' Policy on Selling Food Grown in #SewageSludge http://t.co/2nlDvKyo

  2. Food Rights Network
    Food Rights Network: I uploaded a @YouTube video http://t.co/q8waEvLE Whole Foods' Sludge Policy

  3. Food Rights Network

  4. Food Rights Network
    Food Rights Network: "New Study Reveals Widespread and Copious Use of Toxic Flame Retardants" @prwatch http://t.co/M3WkqbIs

Recent Comments

Twitter

Keep up on Twitter!

  1. Steve Farndale

  2. Mark J Houdeshell